Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Fresh scoping bid launched for major windfarm off Angus coast

Post Thumbnail

Councils in Angus, Fife and Dundee have been asked for their opinions on a massive offshore wind development.

Inch Cape Offshore Limited (ICOL) was awarded exclusive development rights in 2011 for a site 10 miles off the Angus coast, originally due for 213 turbines.

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds challenged Scottish Minister consent for four schemes – Inch Cape, Seagreen Alpha, Seagreen Bravo and Neart na Gaoithe – over fears that birds could be harmed by blades.

This appeal was overturned on May 16 and ICOL has now asked for a scoping opinion for a much smaller scheme of 72 turbines, which take advantage of “advances in technology” to get more power from each unit.

The Tayside and Fife councils have been asked by Marine Scotland to compile their opinions about “key environmental issues” and ideas to mitigate the impact of a smaller scheme.

Marine renewables casework manager Joao Queiros states: “The ultimate aim of the scoping exercise is to assist the developer in identifying the key environmental issues surrounding this proposal.

“Scottish Ministers achieve this aim by drawing on the knowledge of local authorities and consultees alike through the formal consultation process…

“The scoping exercise should give an early indication of where mitigation measures may be necessary.

“In tandem with the prioritising of environmental issues, this will allow Scottish Ministers to provide developers with a full and accurate opinion of what should be included in the environmental statement.”

Councils must submit their views to Marine Scotland by June 2 this year.

In 2013, fears were expressed that the sea view towards the historic Bell Rock lighthouse would see the 200-year-old structure dwarfed by turbines 5.5 times its size.

In July 2016, Lord Stewart heard RSPB’s concerns about the impact on migratory wild bird species and their protected habitat population, including Atlantic puffins, northern gannets and black-legged kittiwakes, as well as guillemots and razorbills.

The judge held that the Scottish Ministers had failed to comply with regulations, and failed to consult on environmental information about the projects and made their decision “unlawfully” taking account of information without consultation.

He also held that the “appropriate assessment” was flawed in that it applied the “wrong test” in relation to ornithological risk assessment.

Lord Carloway ruled that his colleague Lord Stewart was wrong to allow the legal challenge, and the Scottish Government acted properly and gave proper consideration to the areas being a home for rare wildlife.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]