Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

£20k-plus per annum projection for webcasting Angus Council meetings

Town and County Hall in Forfar.
Town and County Hall in Forfar.

Projections for webcasting meetings of Angus Council have come in at more than £80,000 for the next four years.

After Forfar Conservative councillor Braden Davy floated the idea of broadcasting debating chamber discussions, elected members at a full council meeting in Forfar’s Town and County Hall on Thursday afternoon will be asked whether they want to press on with more detailed investigation of the idea.

Council officers have studied audience figures from other authorities who already record their meetings – including Aberdeen where full council proceedings enjoy an average live audience of 227 people.

The authority has also examined how webcasting might be delivered and presented costings for two set-ups –  a subscription-based system through a self-service set-up run by council staff, and a fully-managed arrangement with four fixed cameras in the chamber controlled by a tablet device.

First-year costs are between £23,000 and £26,000, rising to four-year totals of £72,000 or £82,000.

IT innovation manager Steve Leslie’s report states: “Members would need to be mindful of the implications of, and interpretation of, debate in the chamber creating a wider and broader debate in the community.

“This would likely result in more engagement with individuals and groups requiring feedback and response.

“Other councils appear to have been selective over which committee meetings are broadcast and archived and a decision would be required about how members would wish to handle this aspect.”

Mr Davy has said he hopes colleagues will be keen to investigate the idea further.

“The report outlines some clear benefits such as providing a more detailed record of discussions for members of the public beyond published minutes,” he said.

“It also makes it more accessible as there is difficulty for those who work being able to attend afternoon meetings, and those who may be disabled and find travelling difficult. Webcasting allows all to watch our proceedings when they see fit.

“In Aberdeen an average of 227 watch meetings lives, with more watching archived footage. Since being elected a councillor there has only ever been a handful of members of the public attending. This shows the huge increase in engagement this proposal can have.

“I hope to see unanimous support for this once again. Councillors shouldn’t hide behind four walls, but be open for scrutiny and debate.

“That’s why I will be asking for this to go to public consultation before the final report is brought back so we can see whether members of the public think this is a worthwhile exercise.”