Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Secret’ meeting will decide council’s next move in Forfar leisure centre demolition saga

The Lochside Leisure Centre which closed in February 2017.
The Lochside Leisure Centre which closed in February 2017.

The next step in the costly and long-running legal saga surrounding the future of a disused Angus leisure centre will be decided behind closed doors.

After losing a landmark case over their handling of the decision to demolish Forfar’s Lochside leisure centre, a full council meeting on Thursday will consider the authority’s response to the ruling of the Court of Session’s inner house.

The reception area of the old Lochside Leisure Centre.

Last month, Scotland most senior judge, Lord Carloway and colleague Lord Menzies found in favour of Forfar businessmen Mark Guild and Donald Stewart over their challenge against the decision to raze the centre, which closed since early 2017 when it was replaced with the £39 million town community campus.

Mark Guild (left) and Donald Stewart have led the fight to save the centre from demolition.

Lord Menzies concluded the authority did not follow the rules of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015 which requires councils to consult with the public about plans to dispose of common good properties.

It overturned an earlier ruling by fellow High Court judge Lady Carmichael which had said the 2019 handling of the decision to bulldoze the building, at an estimated cost of £500,000, was not unreasonable.

Court costs for the two sides have run into six figures and it is believed the Supreme Court is the last remaining option for the council to continue their fight.

Councillors will consider the matter in private under rules relating to counsel opinion on legal matters the authority is involved in.

Mr Guild said: “In effect this is a secret meeting to discuss a public building in which we are all interested.”