Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Inquiry will determine Murray Royal development’s impact on Perth roads

The historic former Murray Royal Hospital which could be converted into flats.
The historic former Murray Royal Hospital which could be converted into flats.

A Scottish Government inquiry has opened in Perth to determine the full impact of new housing on city centre traffic.

The week-long probe focuses on contentious plans for new housing at the old Murray Royal Hospital site.

Rivertree Residential wants to build 128 homes at the old psychiatric facility, off Muirhall Road. The company complained to Scottish ministers last year, when Perth and Kinross Council failed to make a decision on planning consent.

The inquiry, led by Scottish Government reporter Dan Jackman, began on Monday with discussions on planning policy and legal issues.

Talks on Tuesday will further explore the potential impact on traffic, including the effect of the proposed Cross Tay Link Road.

One of the most contentious issues will be Rivertree’s traffic impact report, which has been rubbished by Bridgend, Gannochy and Kinnoull Community Council.

Vice-chairman Dave Beattie described the document as “unfit for purpose”.

He said: “Our community’s main concern, apart from the obvious inconvenience and stress of major delays to local journeys, is the significant threat to the health of our vulnerable population as a consequence of air pollution.”

In his witness statement, Mr Beattie said: “Our evidence will show that the transport assessment submitted on behalf of the appellant (Rivertree) contains fundamental errors.

“The appellant makes great store by their claims that their errors are a consequence of the council’s advice and guidance.

“Whilst it can be argued that PKC has not demonstrated the competence and professionalism that is expected or required of a local authority, the appellant’s transport assessment contains errors and invalid assumptions that totally undermine the integrity of the reported conclusions.”

Gordon Diamond, of Ove Arup and Partners, on behalf of Rivertree, insisted that the traffic study was “robust” and followed an approach agreed in writing with Perth and Kinross Council.

He wrote that, according to his findings, the Bridgend junction operates within capacity and there is no justification for the council to delay planning approval until the delivery of the Cross Tay Link Road.

In his precognition statement, Alexander Deans, Transport Planning Team Leader with PKC, said: “The issue for the council is whether the (transport assessment) report is accurate. When it came in, it became clear that transport officers considered that it under-reported the issues.

“A site visit at peak times, prior to producing the report, would have highlighted the queuing issue.”

The inquiry is expected to continue at Perth’s Royal George Hotel until Friday.