Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

R&A looks for “solutions not blame” for slow play

Jason Day and Jordan Spieth have both been criticised for slow play.
Jason Day and Jordan Spieth have both been criticised for slow play.

The R&A are looking at “solutions” rather than blame in a new document designed to bring together best practice at preventing slow play in golf.

The Pace of Play Manual has grown out of the “Time for Golf” conference held in St Andrews last year and aims for a multi-faceted approach to the problem issue.

However there will be disappointment that there is virtually no reference in the manual to the elite game, despite recent criticism of the pace of play of the world’s top two players, Jason Day and Jordan Spieth.

And while the R&A conclude that too-severe courses are a major factor in slow play, they refute there is a link with this and the distance the modern golf ball is travelling.

Grant Moir, director of rules at the R&A, said the manual – which will be sent to every golf club in Great Britain and Ireland and to all affiliated unions worldwide – was not concerned with pointing the finger at players of whatever ability.

“There tends to be a focus on the impact of the player on pace of play and in some way too much of an emphasis,” he said. “Often the issues are in place before the player even reaches the golf course, starting intervals are too short, the course is too difficult, and often a couple of players taking longer than they should will have less impact that people think.

“If you don’t get the management side of it and the course side of it right then really you are almost doomed to have issues with pace of play.”

The R&A were not looking to issue blame or “name and shame” slow players.

“The manual isn’t focused on the elite game, on specific players and those who are out on tour. We are offering solutions here for the game as a whole,” added Moir.

“We’re not looking to blame here. What the manual is doing for the first time is to bring together a whole range of potential solutions to pace of play issues.

“We’re not saying one size fits all. Some places do not have an issue with slow play at all. What we’re doing is saying if you as a golf club, an administrator or a resort have round times are longer than they should be, then here are an array of potential solutions for you tap into.”

The manual’s only reference to the professional game is a small section which while “in no way looking to excuse elite golfers who make take an excessive time to play” appreciates that the top pros require more time and requests that the “futile mimicking of elite golfers should be avoided”.

“What our review shows is that when we are talking about players at club level playing slower than they should it tends to be down to the basics, not so much imitating elite golf,” continued Moir.

“It’s core things, walking at a decent pace, putting your bag in the right place when you’re exiting the green, being ready to play when it’s your turn. Some may focus on imitating elite golf but the impact of that is over emphasised.”

Mimicking elite golf set-up at courses was maybe a more significant an issue, he agreed.

“I don’t think necessarily the distance of the ball is something that impacts on the pace of play so that’s why it’s something that we haven’t felt the need to address on the course set up aspect,” continued Moir.

“For club golfers it’s really more issues with the types of rough that are making courses play longer than they should, or playing from tees that mean the course it too long for their ability, and also green speed and firmness.

“Some golfers like to see greens at certain speeds they’ve seen on TV, but there are occasions where certainly that wouldn’t be appropriate for club golfers.

“There is a general perception through the game that fast greens mean good greens and I think that at the R&A we are working hard to try to dispel that.

“Having fast greens is neither appropriate or sustainable and we will continue to try and put out that message that fast is always better than slower greens is simply not the case.”