Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Patients demand answers over Tayside chemotherapy ‘scandal’ amid anger over health board’s response

General view of the exterior entrance to Ninewells Hospital.
General view of the exterior entrance to Ninewells Hospital.

Patients have demanded clear answers over the health risks imposed by a breast cancer treatment “scandal” at NHS Tayside, amid anger at the lack of information given to the families of those who have died.

The Scottish Government will turn over by the end of next week a risk assessment into the treatment of 304 individuals who were given lesser amounts of the chemotherapy drug docetaxel than elsewhere in the UK.

Doctors have rejected any suggestion of known health risks with the care plan and insisted the decision was made as they believed the full dose was “unacceptably toxic”.

But former patients and families of some of the 14 women who died during the treatment have called for the full risk assessment to be made immediately available, so loved ones can finally have definitive answers.

It is understood the report has been made available to bosses at NHS Tayside but the health board is unable to share its contents until it is officially published by ministers.

Meanwhile, a dedicated helpline set up to support those affected has been shut down after just one week.

One couple said they had been left to agonise over whether a higher dose may have delivered a complete pathological response, meaning no residual invasive disease left in the breast and lymph nodes.

Carole Leishman said she had been “completely floored” by the situation, which had resulted in “a massive detrimental effect” to their wellbeing.

Carole Leishman has been left with unanswered questions over her treatment

She and and her husband Jim insisted Mrs Leishman, who repeatedly demonstrated a desire to be involved in treatment decisions, would have chosen to move to a different health board or seek private care had she been aware of the lesser dose.

Mrs Leishman was in generally good health during the majority of her treatment, even completing long-distance runs into her fifth chemotherapy cycle, and believes she would have coped well with the stronger dose.

She said: “We want the questions we have to be answered as quickly as possible.

“When you are trying to put something like cancer behind you, to have all this brought up again really is an emotional turmoil. We shouldn’t have to go through this.”

Mr Leishman added: “We feel that we deserve to know the answers to this now. We do not want feeble excuses and promises of future reports weeks or months down the line.”

The NHS Tayside Cancer Care Support Group, a network set up by those affected, said it was “disheartened” some had still not been able to arrange an appointment with a specialist, and the dedicated helpline was closed so soon after the news was revealed.

It is understood the families of people who died while receiving the treatment were not contacted by NHS Tayside, and one bereaved mother said they had been “ignored” and left with “no letters, no explanation and no answers to date”.

Administrator Lee Dennis said: “When one is diagnosed with cancer, it is a time of enormous emotional upheaval. You experience fear, sadness, blind panic, and are forced to acknowledge your mortality.

“As time goes on, and with counselling if necessary, these feelings should fade, but many of us have been set back because of this scandal.

Lee Dennis, creator of the NHS Tayside Cancer Care Support group

“As a community, there is a general consensus that the feelings we have are ones of anger and extreme vulnerability. It will be difficult for many of us to trust the medical profession going forward.”

Acting medical director at NHS Tayside, Professor Peter Stonebridge said: “We understand that patients and their families may be feeling worried at this time and we apologise for that.

“I would like to reassure patients that we are making every effort to ensure that they are offered an appointment with an oncologist as quickly as possible to discuss their questions and concerns.

“Following our letter to patients last week, we have already held some additional clinics for affected patients. We are continuing to phone patients to arrange appointments with an oncologist and some patients have already been seen by their oncologist at their routine appointment.

“We will contacting the next of kin of the 14 patients who have died since 2016 to arrange for them to have the opportunity to discuss their relative’s care informed by the assessment made by the specialist external adviser.”

NHS Tayside complaints and feedback team can be contacted on on 0800 027 5507 or

A Scottish Government spokesman confirmed the risk assessment will now be published next week, instead of the end of the month as planned, following increasing pressure.

He said: “We recognise that the Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS) report may be concerning for patients and their families, however patient safety is always the number one priority for the Scottish Government and NHS Scotland.

“In advance of the HIS report the Scottish Government convened a multidisciplinary clinical immediate review group to produce a risk assessment. Their findings are urgently being considered by NHS Tayside to ensure the necessary support and action plans can be put in place.

“The risk assessment will be published next week.”