Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Bitterly disappointing’: Angry campaigners slam Reporter decision to allow controversial development at Milnathort

Residents took to the streets in protest of the plans for Pitdownies Farm.
Residents took to the streets in protest of the plans for Pitdownies Farm.

Angry residents have slammed a decision to allow a controversial housing scheme despite scores of objections and an initial council rejection.

Campaigners have described the findings allowing Springfield Properties to build its 67-home development at Pitdownies, Milnathort, as “bitterly disappointing” after the proposal was unanimously rejected by councillors in February.

Plans for the Kinross-shire project received more than 160 objections from the local community and were also recommended for refusal by council planning officers.

Springfield Properties appealed to the Scottish Government Reporter in May and the body has declared it is minded to grant planning permission despite ongoing concerns about GP facilities in the area and the effects of construction on the water quality at Loch Leven.

Controversial Milnathort housing development set for refusal after community backlash

Kevin Heneghan, of Pitdownies Action Group, believes the Reporter was dismissive of local concerns.

He said: “The Scottish Government Reporter’s decision to enable the Pitdownies development to go ahead is bitterly disappointing.

“The Reporter ignored the grave concerns residents have regarding the huge increase in traffic the development will bring in and around the village.

“He was also dismissive of the evidence around the strain on local infrastructure and the negative impact on Loch Leven, which is a Site for Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), a National Nature Reserve (NNR), and a Special Protected Area (SPA).

“Perth and Kinross councillors unanimously rejected the application only for the Reporter to sweep away the evidence that demonstrated this development should not have gone ahead.

“We accept that some housing development has to take place, but not on this scale and at this rate.”

Kinross-shire residents fearful as ’10 years’ of developments set to happen at once

Despite the protests against the development, David Buylla, the Reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers, said he was minded to allow the appeal and grant planning permission.

My Buylla said: “There has been a high level of public opposition to this proposal.

“Much of the concern is with the principle of developing this site and/or of building any more homes in Milnathort.

“While I have taken those concerns into account, I am conscious that, through
the Local Development Plan, the council has already resolved that further housing in the settlement should be encouraged and that this is an appropriate site for that to take place.

Surface of Perthshire loch turns blue as toxic algae, harmful to humans and animals, appears

“I agree with the council’s conclusions on those questions of principle, but even if I didn’t, I could not remove this site’s allocation for housing development, as appears to be the outcome sought by a number of objectors.”

Addressing the concerns over Loch Leven, Mr Buyalla noted: “The appellant has confirmed with Scottish Water that the Milnathort wastewater treatment works has capacity to accommodate this development.

“Therefore, I am satisfied that phosphorus discharge into Loch Leven is not a reason to withhold planning permission for this proposal.”

A spokesperson for Perth and Kinross Council said: “We note the decision of the Reporter.”