Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Battlelines drawn over huge Almond Valley plan

Almond Valley plans are being laid before the Scottish Government
Almond Valley plans are being laid before the Scottish Government

Council chiefs are fighting attempts to rescue a massive Perth housing plan.

The long-awaited Almond Valley village scheme, which has been in the pipeline for more than 20 years, was kicked out by councillors after widespread criticism by residents.

The Pilkington Trust, which is behind the 1,300 home expansion, is urging the Scottish Government to overturn the decision. The organisation is also demanding that Perth and Kinross Council pay its expenses.

Developers argued that the development management committee had acted unreasonably because it delayed the project and went against advice from the council’s own legal team.

Now the local authority is trying to block the appeal, arguing that the site – on the western edge of Perth – is a flood risk.

Agents acting for the council are also standing by the committee’s ruling that the project would be detrimental to neighbours, despite warnings that their arguments were not competent and would probably fail on appeal.

A spokesman said: “Irrespective of what may have been said, the committee can go against the recommendations of officers.”

He said there were “legitimate” concerns about the proposal. “The appeal site is on a functional flood plain,” he said. “Further scrutiny of the assessment of the flooding issue has legitimately led to the development management committee adopting the precautionary principle on what is a site prone to flooding.”

Meanwhile, objectors are also preparing to help fight the appeal. Dozens have written to the government’s directorate for planning and environmental appeals calling for the scheme to be scrapped.

Solicitors acting for Methven Community Council claimed there was no longer a need for the project. “We contend that there has been a number of significant material changes in circumstances since the allocation of the Almond Valley Village, which now bring into question the justification for its allocation.

“At the time of an examination in 2012-2013, there were few significant residential development proposals in Perth, with a requirement for large land releases to meet an identified housing land requirement.

“Since then however, a number of large scale residential proposals have been brought forward and Perth and Kinross Council now have an extremely healthy housing land supply positive over at least the next 12 years.”

Almond and Earn councillor Alan Livingstone, who voted against the plan at May’s meeting, is also objecting to the appeal.

“The application contravenes democracy,” he said. “There have been 20 years of well-nigh unanimous objection to proposed developments here. Over this period, the various expressions of Perth and Kinross Council, local councillors, the community council and most importantly the existing community, have all voiced hostility and opposition to it.

“I believe democracy is under severe threat here.”

In paperwork submitted to Scottish Ministers, a spokesman for Edinburgh-based Pilkington said: “The development has clear and straightforward policy support and the reasons for refusal do not bear scrutiny.

“Further, the express and clear advice of the committee’s own advisers, both planning and legal, was that there was no basis to support the reasons that were proposed.”

He added: “It is unreasonable to impose the delay and cost that this appeal entails with no good reasons to refuse planning and many good reasons to grant.”