Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Quarry firm plans to appeal after Blairgowrie expansion plans rejected

An aerial view of Marlee Quarry near Blairgowrie. Image: Google Maps.
An aerial view of Marlee Quarry near Blairgowrie. Image: Google Maps.

The firm behind plans to expand a quarry near Blairgowrie says it will launch an appeal after the proposals were turned down.

A Perth and Kinross Council committee was unanimous in its opposition to the plans for Marlee Quarry, to the south-west of the town.

Members met on Wednesday to discuss the proposals from Laird Aggregates Ltd.

The company wants to start work in three fields neighbouring its existing site – saying the expansion is “integral” to its business plan as current reserves will run out within two years.

Marlee Quarry could be extended into neighbouring fields.
Laird wanted to extend Marlee Quarry into neighbouring fields. Image: Google Street View.

Planning officials recommended that the application be approved.

But after more than 100 objections were lodged, with concerns including noise, environmental impact and the loss of agricultural land, the proposals were turned down.

Local councillor Tom McEwan described the plans as “undesirable”, adding: “They will create a significant visual change to the area.

“You can’t build an extension to your house across the road.”

Concerns over impact of quarry on residents

Other concerns included the impact of dust from the quarry, the proximity to nearby houses and safety on the B947 – which runs between the existing and proposed quarry sites.

The committee also pointed to the fact that Laird had only held one consultation over its proposals – though the firm said a second was not needed.

Campaigner Tim Baynes, speaking on behalf of residents who are opposed to the quarry expansion, told The Courier he was “absolutely delighted” with the decision.

He said: “It’s been a sword hanging over us the last 18 months and we’re so pleased that the council has given it really careful consideration, and looked at it in detail.

Quarry campaigner Tim Baynes (third from right) with fellow campaigners after the planning meeting on Wednesday. Image: Emma Duncan/DC Thomson.

“I was concerned going into the meeting given the huge resources that the applicant has at its disposal, and that all the professional and technical reports and things would overwhelm it.

“I’m very glad the council has looked at the human aspect of it, as well as the numbers of tonnes of sand and gravel, and decided that was more important.

“It isn’t just the narrow interest of us residents, it is a big thing for Blairgowrie.

“Blairgowrie’s future is seen as a tourist town and what you don’t want in a tourist town is a big quarry opening up on the edge of town.

“We are cautious that Laird has put a lot of investment in here and may appeal it, and would be disappointed if that happens.”

Decision ‘based on unfounded claims’ – Laird

Laird has confirmed to The Courier it will appeal the decision to the Scottish Government.

In a statement, director Jamie Laird added: “We are very disappointed with the committee’s decision to refuse the planning application.

“It appears that the committee has chosen to base the decision on the unfounded assertions of local residents as opposed to the consideration of the detailed specialist reports submitted in support of the application.

The proposal was in compliance with the local development plan

Jamie Laird

“These reports having been subject to confirmation by statutory consultees, who are independent experts, and who have accepted that the proposed extension could be undertaken without any significant environmental or amenity impacts.

“The committee decision was contrary to the report of handling, by the head of planning and development, which confirmed that the proposal was in compliance with the local development plan and gave a strong recommendation for approval.”

Conversation